🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear talks with Washington provided that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi stated solely negotiations was effective, and shared recent overtures had originated from go-betweens to restart talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Difficult Route

Araghchi is walking a challenging path since Iran does not want appear to be proceeding from a stance of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more resilient defensively and psychologically from the joint assault on its atomic facilities in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to process nuclear material on home soil that it will never give up" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Negotiations Unexpectedly Concluded

The earlier sessions of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, attacked Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader asserting the facilities had been obliterated. Afterward, Western states employed their right to reimpose global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the deal to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Present Position

Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be reintroduced in certain ways if talks resume.

The US president in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to restart talks, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Tehran states negotiations is not part of a performance.

Negotiating Stance

In his address to the conference, aimed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the concept of international law, the foreign minister said the fortnight-long engagement showed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had abandoned dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be viable and stays the primary answer to settle disputes, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"In case they talk to the Iranian people with the language of dignity and respect, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and rebuilding, Araghchi stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He continued: "We effectively endured this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, stays intact. The facilities and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but were unable to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the country in the wake of this assault."